Fresno ought to have a state psychological well being fee member


Editorials and different Opinion content material supply views on points vital to our neighborhood and are unbiased of the work of our newsroom reporters.

Roughly 5.5 million adults in California have a psychological well being situation. Of these, 1.2 million have a critical sickness, in keeping with the Nationwide Alliance on Psychological Sickness.

And 46% of California adults reported affected by nervousness or melancholy in February 2021, a probable results of the COVID pandemic, NAMI mentioned.

But the psychological well being wants of individuals in San Diego County may be totally different than these of Fresno County residents.

It’s for that motive that Assemblymember Jim Patterson has authored a invoice that might require the state Psychological Well being Providers Oversight and Accountability Fee to have members from every of California’s 10 areas.

Because it stands at this time, there isn’t any San Joaquin Valley consultant on the 16-member fee.

What fee does

The fee was created when California voters handed the Psychological Well being Providers Act in 2004. The group’s job is to supervise how that act will get carried out. Particularly, the fee awards grants to counties for applications, gathers and shares information, promotes greatest practices and encourages analysis.

The act is meant to enhance how psychological well being providers get delivered to individuals affected by sicknesses, however that job is daunting.

NAMI reviews that 1.5 million Californians who want psychological well being remedy can’t get it, with a 3rd saying it’s due to value.

Practically 400,000 younger Californians ages 12 to 17 have melancholy, NAMI reviews. Of these, 64% didn’t get any care within the final 12 months.

Statewide illustration

Of the 16 members on the fee, one is appointed by the lawyer normal and one other by the state faculties superintendent. The Meeting and state Senate leaders every get to nominate a member.

That leaves 12 members for the governor to nominate, and it’s on this pool that Patterson seeks to have correct geographic illustration.

In a letter to Newsom, Patterson notes that “the present make-up of the Psychological Well being Oversight and Accountability Fee lacks any illustration within the northern San Joaquin Valley, the southern San Joaquin Valley, the Inland Empire, and the Orange County areas.

“With out correct illustration from these areas, it can’t be assured that vital psychological well being wants are being met.

AB 1668 seeks to make sure that people dealing with psychological well being challenges are appropriately represented, no matter the place they dwell within the state. This invoice acknowledges that totally different areas could require totally different wants on the subject of psychological well being providers, and there’s no one-size-fits-all mannequin. ”

A typical-sense measure, AB 1668 unanimously handed each the Meeting and Senate, although Patterson is a Republican. Democrats maintain a supermajority in each homes of the Legislature and may brush apart GOP measures if they need.

There was no opposition to the invoice in both the Meeting or the Senate. There’s additionally no added value.

Because the statistics present, psychological well being is changing into extra strained and in want of consideration within the pandemic period. Newsom ought to signal the invoice in order that it turns into regulation, and higher illustration will be dropped at the psychological well being oversight panel.


What are editorials, and who writes them?

Editorials characterize the collective opinion of the The Fresno Bee Editorial Board. They don’t mirror the person opinions of board members, or the views of Bee reporters within the information part. Bee reporters don’t take part in editorial board deliberations or weigh in on board choices.

The board consists of Editor Joe Kieta, Opinion Editor Tad Weber, Vida en el Valle Editor Juan Esparza Loera and Vida employees author Maria Ortiz Briones.

We base our opinions on reporting by our colleagues within the information part, and our personal reporting and interviews. Our members attend public conferences, name sources and follow-up on story concepts from readers simply as information reporters do. In contrast to reporters, who’re goal, we share our judgments and state clearly what we expect ought to occur based mostly on our information.

Learn extra by clicking the arrow within the higher proper.

Inform us what you suppose

Chances are you’ll or could not agree with our perspective. We imagine disagreement is wholesome and mandatory for a functioning democracy. If you want to share your individual views on vital occasions to the Fresno area, it’s possible you’ll write a letter to the editor (220 phrases or much less) or e mail an op-ed (600 phrases). Both will be despatched to Resulting from a excessive quantity of submissions, we aren’t capable of publish every part we obtain.

This story was initially printed June 21, 2022 5:00 AM.

Associated tales from Sacramento Bee


Leave a Comment